That emotion, in effect, turns; those who hopeful looked approach transformer leave it along the way and return to their habits of indifference. In other words, they materialize not the feelings that inspired them, they won’t vote, not running change, is diluted in what in this text have been called the Alka Seltzer effect. It is now a few surveys that reflect literally what should not happen. That is, it is not sure are fudged or that are made without the usual rigor. It is the moment of evaporation of the Tablet bubbles for digestion is so ephemeral that we are almost reaching the time to speak the impossibility of real and effective measurement of the electoral intention of a given population.

Even if one accepts that a survey reflects a specific moment, this is not valid argument to reflect what is happening. One comes to arise if required elements conflictless incorporated into the old ways of determining the intention of voting or the complexity of the transition times becomes impossible mission advance to the results of an electoral consultation. However, the economic future of the polling or its adaptation to a shifting time will be problem of stakeholders and planners of election campaigns and those who want to know the ins and outs of the electors to adapt to them the pursuit of support. The subject of this transitional period and the final arrival of the future Fund is the one that interests us. It is why happens, especially among youth, the Alka Seltzer effect, the underlying problem. Are they distracted quickly the objective of their political hopes, but we must begin by warning that they are as well in all aspects of life. Adrenaline burning appears to require them new stimuli every moment, not without admitting the existence of exceptions in those that remain on the attractive new approach.